We find what qualifies, write it up the way CRA expects, and file it — so your team gets back to building.
SR&ED claims move through the same sequence every time. We run point on all four so your team stays heads-down on the actual work.
We review your codebase, tickets, and sprint history against CRA's technological uncertainty test — free, no commitment.
We interview your engineers and turn the messy, real version of events into the technical narrative CRA is trained to read.
We prepare the T661 and financial schedules and file directly with CRA. You review before anything goes out.
CRA issues your credit. We stay on the file if any follow-up questions or review comes back.
SR&ED isn't just labs and lab coats. If your team hit a technical wall and worked through it systematically, it's likely eligible.
The branch you scrapped and the approach that didn't scale count for as much as the one that shipped — sometimes more.
Redesigning a system when the fix wasn't obvious from documentation or prior art is exactly what the program is built for.
Each pass at a hard problem — new data structure, new model, new protocol — is a data point in the claim, not just a commit.
Internal tooling and infrastructure work can qualify too, if it involved genuine technical uncertainty to resolve.
A 20-minute call tells you whether you qualify — before you commit to anything.